Current:Home > StocksWisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal -Pinnacle Profit Strategies
Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal
View
Date:2025-04-14 04:22:56
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge ruled Monday that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine’s use of a voting van that traveled around the city in 2022.
Republicans opposed the use of the van, the only one of its kind in Wisconsin, saying its use was against the law, increased the chances of voter fraud and was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Racine officials, the Democratic National Committee and the Milwaukee-based voting advocacy group Black Leaders Organizing for Communities refuted those claims and defended the legality of the van, saying there was no specific prohibition against it.
The lawsuit over the mobile voting van is one of several in battleground Wisconsin that could affect voting rules in the upcoming presidential election.
The van was first used in Racine’s municipal elections in 2022. It was purchased with grant money Racine received from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the nonprofit created by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, Racine City Clerk Tara McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled across the city to meet voters in their neighborhoods and collect early ballots.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. They argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the November election that year, saying that there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. That led the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty to then file its lawsuit.
Racine County Circuit Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, in a ruling late Monday, overturned the elections commission’s dismissal of the complaint, saying state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
“Nowhere can this Court find or has been provided any authority allowing the use of a van or vehicle as an alternate absentee voting vehicle,” the judge wrote.
He rejected the argument from defendants that the use of mobile voting sites was allowable because there is no specific prohibition against them.
The judge said his ruling wasn’t a determination on whether mobile voting sites were a good idea or not. That is up to the Legislature to decide, Gasiorkiewicz said.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission and the state Department of Justice, which represented it in the lawsuit, did not return messages seeking comment on whether the decision will be appealed. McMenamin was in a meeting Tuesday and did not return a message seeking comment.
Early in-person absentee voting in Wisconsin for the municipal spring election begins Feb. 6. The presidential primary is April 2, with absentee voting allowed two weeks before it.
If appealed, the case could ultimately be decided by Wisconsin’s liberal-controlled state Supreme Court.
Lucas Vebber, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, hailed the ruling.
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another,” Vebber said. “This decision does just that.”
veryGood! (573)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Half a million gallons of sewage leaks into Oregon river after facility malfunction
- Texas Fracking Zone Emits 90% More Methane Than EPA Estimated
- Coach Flash Sale: Save 85% on Handbags, Shoes, Jewelry, Belts, Wallets, and More
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Inside Princess Anne's Unique Royal World
- Camila Cabello and Shawn Mendes’ Latest Reunion Will Have You Saying My Oh My
- Today’s Climate: June 10, 2010
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Family Dollar recalls Colgate products that were improperly stored
Ranking
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Merck sues U.S. government over plan to negotiate Medicare drug prices, claiming extortion
- How to show your friends you love them, according to a friendship expert
- Princess Charlotte Is a Royally Perfect Big Sister to Prince Louis at King Charles III's Coronation
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- See Every Guest at King Charles III and Queen Camilla's Coronation
- Legal fights and loopholes could blunt Medicare's new power to control drug prices
- AOC, Sanders Call for ‘Climate Emergency’ Declaration in Congress
Recommendation
In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
What Chemicals Are Used in Fracking? Industry Discloses Less and Less
Anti-abortion groups are getting more calls for help with unplanned pregnancies
Prince Harry Reunites With Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie at King Charles III's Coronation
The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
How Queen Elizabeth’s Corgis Are Still Living Like Royalty
Missouri man Michael Tisius executed despite appeals from former jurors
Virginia graduation shooting that killed teen, stepdad fueled by ongoing dispute, police say